TechSoup Blog

SEO vs. GEO: How Nonprofits Can Optimize Content for AI and Search

Written by Wes Holing | Jun 22, 2026 4:34:28 PM
  • Many websites are experiencing a decrease in traffic as a result of AI chats and generative AI summaries.
  • Search engines are becoming “answer engines.”
  • Traditional SEO rules also apply to generative AI.


Since mid-2024, when Google and Bing added generative artificial intelligence (AI) summaries to search results, traffic from search engines has declined precipitously for most websites. Search engine optimization (SEO) consultants have closely monitored updates to their algorithms as they make the move from search engines to what Google is calling “answer engines.”

These discoveries are helping steer nonprofit and other organizations toward a new model of website content to stay relevant, and toward new "generative engine optimization" (GEO) techniques to get picked up by AI-powered search. This guide will focus on Google primarily, but the guidelines apply to most forms of traditional search engines and more recent AI services like ChatGPT and Claude.

The Evolution of Search and Generative AI

When Google launched almost 30 years ago, its search engine results pages (SERPs) had a few key features: a list of search result links, ads, and pagination at the bottom. In the years since, Google began adding more features based on the contents of the pages it linked to, most of which appear at the top of the SERP.

Google also added featured pieces of content in 2012 for certain types of searches, such as recipes, movie times, and products. These drew from a “Knowledge Graph,” a proprietary system that didn't just index pages based on keywords but also a page’s “structured data,” or information provided by the author about the page’s contents. This code accompanies the content to tell search engines explicitly which details are most relevant.

Three years later, Google added the “People also ask” feature near the top of the page, which aggregates related questions based on your query. These drew from the contents of the pages it had crawled in an attempt to better offer answers to users rather than just a list of resources.

What Hasn’t Changed: Traditional SEO

In the years since, Google has continued adding features to its SERPs, but the most significant recent addition is the generative AI summary. Website owners have since worked to revise their content to appear within this prime piece of search real estate, but the good news is that many of the traditional SEO strategies still remain relevant.

Content Guidelines

Google introduced in 2014 a set of quality content guidelines, initially using the acronym “EAT,” later expanded to “E-E-A-T.” These guidelines prioritize:

  • Experience: the original, authentic story of the author and their experience with the subject (e.g., a product, a venue, a meal)
  • Expertise: the author’s credentials or previous experience with the subject matter
  • Authoritativeness: the author’s or site’s reputation as it relates to the subject
  • Trustworthiness: the site’s overall credibility

Whether you’re writing your “about us” page or a lengthy blog post, these guidelines are still crucial for both search rank and whether your content will be part of an AI summary. Consider them a checklist for each page and post that you’re publishing.

Inbound Links

As a measure of those E-E-A-T guidelines, Google still prioritizes .gov and .edu addresses. Anyone can buy a .com or a .org address; .gov and .edu addresses, though, can only be purchased by government agencies and accredited institutes of higher learning, respectively, which means that the barrier of entry is higher.

Additionally, these websites are more likely to have accurate, impartial information. The Department of Health and Human Services website, for example, features information on federal housing laws straight from the source; a housing law firm’s .com website, however, may have useful information, but it is definitionally less credible than the source of the law itself.

Google set itself apart from other search engines in its early days by using the links from one website to another as a means of determining the site’s authority. If a major website links to your website, that’s a sign that your page may also be important. In other words, if the popular kids in high school are interested in you, your social rank at your school goes up.

The added value here for nonprofit organizations is that, while .org sites aren’t given the same priority as .gov and .edu sites, nonprofits are more likely to interact with those sites. If your organization offers critical services in a certain geographic or subject area, or it offers critical, original information that no one else has, this could result in “inbound links” to your site, which signal to search engines that a trusted authority considers your page authoritative and trustworthy, too.

Page Layout

Google also considers “time on page,” a metric that measures how long users remain on the page before navigating away, as a means of determining whether the page has quality content. In addition to writing copy that resonates with the reader, visual elements can break up long walls of text. Comparison tables, numbered and bulleted lists, embedded videos, photos and graphics, and other visually interesting materials all help increase the time users stay on the page.

Traditional SEO experts have also advocated including page subheadings within page content. As HTML, these are H2 though H6 elements; on the page, they are the phrases that break up long strings of paragraphs. From an SEO perspective, though, they are one of the more valuable pieces of real estate for the keywords you want to rank for.

What Has Changed: Keywords and “Answer-First” Content

Google’s May 2026 update included an announcement that the site would shift from being a search engine to an “answer engine.” More than just a conceptual change, there are actionable changes you can make to the content and structure of your nonprofit website to better optimize for this new approach.

Keywords

Traditionally, SEO experts have advised publishers to consider which “keywords” — one or two primary words and phrases — that your page should optimize for. This involves strategically peppering them throughout the copy, especially in those subheadings and the page title.

This approach is still necessary, but after Google’s May 2026 update, a successful ranking strategy must be broader and consider a conversational approach.

To address this, news and other sites have begun adding bulleted summaries to the top of long pages. (You may have noticed one such section at the top of this post.) Search engines prioritize copy that appears higher in the page than lower, so the most salient information in short sentences has a better chance of getting picked up by generative summaries.

Answer-First Content

While only about 17 percent of queries in Google are phrased as actual questions, search results pages now treat every query as a question. A long-tail query like “best women's homeless overnight shelters” automatically includes your location and provides an generative AI summary as though you had asked “What are the best women’s homeless overnight shelters?”

When writing to optimize for search and generative summaries, consider: What question am I answering? Break up your page into sections with subheadings that address the question a user may search for. Keywords still play an important role here: Think about which words users may use to describe the subject, not necessarily how you describe it within your organization or sector.

You can even add an FAQ section to the bottom of your post that states direct questions and answers. For example:

Is your shelter open 24 hours?

Yes, Binghamton Housing Collective is open 24 hours a day. Our placement staff is available from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. Emergency, security, and concierge services are available 24 hours a day.

Depending on your site’s content management system, you may be able to also enable “schema,” a structured piece of data that doesn’t appear on the page but does signal to Google which are the questions and which are the answers. As a part of its June 2026 updates, Google no longer displays this FAQ data within its search results pages, except for authoritative health and government sites, but the data itself is still crucial for appearing within the generated summaries. Schema can apply to hundreds of subjects across your site beyond just FAQs, too.

AI-Generated Content

Google stated in 2023 that “Appropriate use of AI or automation is not against our guidelines,” but added that automation attempting to manipulate rankings still violates those guidelines.

However, the bar for quality content is now higher after the August 2025 spam update. This algorithm change means that poorly produced content can be read as spam and deprecated in search, regardless of the intent. See Google’s spam policies for more information to see if your site could be affected.

Ultimately, though, the limitation of AI-generated content is the nature of large language models (LLMs) in search. Copy generated by ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, or any other generative AI service can only draw from what has already been published. It ingests large amounts of copy and produces an algorithmically generated summary of it.

Google’s E-E-A-T search guidelines and more restrictive spam policies mean that unoriginal content lacks a competitive edge and is less likely to rank or be included in generative summaries. After all, if the search results page can already summarize the subject, your summary doesn’t add anything new for it to crawl and may contain factual errors.

llms.txt

One developing approach to search in an era of generative AI is to include an llms.txt file in the root directory of your website. Historically, sites include a robots.txt file that tells search engines which ones can crawl the site and which pages are off-limits, among other things. Site managers have begun adding llms.txt files to their sites in an attempt to signal similar information to generative AI services.

However, this is not a standard approach. Google’s AI optimization guide states that the engine ignores these files, but Google Chrome’s Lighthouse feature reads llms.txt for “a machine-readable summary at the root domain.” Developers will need to sort out this feature before it can be considered a necessary approach, but search marketers are often including it anyway, just in case.

The Measurement Guide for Nonprofits

There are many more search best practices for your nonprofit than we can cover in this guide, but these are some of the more significant changes lately. If you’re ready to check and revise the content of your website for improved search, these are some of the immediate next steps you should take.

  1. Get webmaster tools: If you haven’t already, add your site to Google Search Console and Bing Webmaster Tools. These are crucial sources of information on how your site performs in search and necessary sources of information for the search engines themselves. For example, you can submit your sitemap file to ensure that pages are found and see which queries users are submitting to find your pages.
  2. Evaluate strong pages: Check Search Console and Webmaster Tools for which pages perform well on your site and develop a plan to improve their performance. It may seem counterintuitive to start with the pages that already perform well, but they provide more reliable performance data than weaker pages for evaluating whether your changes are effective.

    Check for the queries that lead users to these pages and where they exist on them: if those keywords are in the subheadings, for example, replicate this approach on your weaker pages. Also check for which sites link to your pages. Those domains benefit your site, and you might benefit more by directly asking them or similarly authoritative sites to link to other pages you offer.
  3. Consider your structure: Page paths play an important role in how engines analyze your site. If every URL looks like nonprofit.org/page-12345, it’s a missed opportunity to add crucial keywords and a hierarchy. Instead, consider what sections your site should have and add subpages within them.

    For example, a nonprofit that focuses on music education and has a blog should consider moving pages within categories in the URL: nonprofit.org/education/reading-music/how-to-read-sheet-music, nonprofit.org/education/reading-music/percussion-vs-brass, etc. These URLs provide more context to search engines and help users better navigate to what they’re looking for.
  4. Write for people: The purpose of this guide is to improve your performance in searches, but all content should be written for human readers. They are the end users, and search engines rely on them for ad revenue, so they are still the priority. Use the E-E-A-T guidelines and consider what your audience wants, not what you want or what may game the system.

    Also consider longer-form content. We hear truisms that “people don’t read” and that we have short attention spans; whether or not those are true, search engines still value long-form content because the deeper the dive, the more likely a user is to find the specific answer they need.
  5. Consolidate and redirect: If your audit reveals that some pages are outdated, redundant, incorrect, or poorly formatted, you’ll be left with a decision to make: delete or update. Google still values fresh content, so outdated but useful pages should be revised; the search engine will still pick up on the new content and hopefully give it a boost thanks to its increased relevance.

    Redundant or unnecessary pages can be deleted, but be sure to redirect them to similar sources on your site. A
    301 redirect will signal to Google and others that whatever rank the page had should be transferred to the destination page and provide a smoother user experience than a “404 file not found” page.
  6. Answer questions: The increased reliance on answer-based results means authors must shift from a more one-way information dump to a more conversational approach. What questions would users ask that could lead them to this page? What information do competitors lack that I can provide? How can I write clear sentences in a way that could be reproduced in a summary?

Summary (Not from AI)

The overall good news about the rise of generative AI within search is that most of the old rules still apply. The tips and tricks SEO experts share are often best for maintaining an edge in a highly competitive environment: people shopping for shoes, companies to invest in, breaking news, etc. Nonprofit organizations, though, face different needs: providing resources to community members in need and connecting with potential donors and volunteers. Write clearly with trust, authority, and reliable sources, and the rest will follow.

[Thumbnail photo: Shutterstock]